![]() Association between vision and hearing impairments and their combined effects on quality of life. Neuropsychology Review, 29, 387–396.Ĭhia, E., Mitchell, P., Rochtchina, E., Foran, S., Golding, M., & Wang, J. A guide to conducting meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. The organization of working memory networks is shaped by early sensory experience. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 997–1002.Ĭardin, V., Rudner, M., De Oliveira, R. Short-term memory span: Insights from sign language. American Annals of the Deaf, 102(2), 254–263 īorenstein, M., Hedges, L. A study of the visual memory of deaf and hearing children. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2(4), 223–233.īlair, F. Enhanced facial discrimination: Effects of experience with American Sign Language. Ordered short-term memory differs in signers and speakers: Implications for models of short-term memory. Do deaf individuals see better? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 512–518.īavelier, D., Newport, E. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: Application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.īaujat, B., Mahé, C., Pignon, J.-P., & Hill, C. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(24), 13468–13472.īaddeley, A., & Hitch, G. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195.īaddeley, A. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(3), 203–214.Ītkinson, R. The contribution of verbal working memory to deaf children’s oral and written production. Similar digit-based working memory in deaf signers and hearing non-signers despite digit span differences. Īndin, J., Orfanidou, E., Cardin, V., Holmer, E., Capek, C. Text composition by deaf and hearing middle-school students: The role of working memory. Īlamargot, D., Lambert, E., Thebault, C., & Dansac, C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of STM and WM in long-term CI users. *References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.Īkçakaya, H., Jayakody, D. Findings are discussed in the context of both Deaf equity and models of serial memory. Quality estimates indicated most studies were of fair quality, with only 38% of studies involving Deaf authors. Population estimates for verbal and visuospatial short-term memory were moderated by age wherein studies with adults demonstrated a stronger hearing advantage than studies with children/adolescents. Visuospatial working memory was not analyzed due to limited power. 001, 95% CI, but no significant effect of deafness on visuospatial short-term memory, g = −0.055, SE = 0.17, p = 0.75, 95% CI. Multivariate meta-analyses indicated a significant, negative effect of deafness on verbal short-term memory (forward recall), g = −1.33, SE = 0.17, p <. The present systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 studies ( N = 1,701 participants) that examined verbal ( n = 15), visuospatial ( n = 10), or both verbal and visuospatial ( n = 10) serial-memory tasks comparing nonimplanted, Deaf signers to hearing nonsigners across the life span. These discrepancies have made consensus difficult to reach which, in turn, slows progress in areas such as education, medical decision-making, and cognitive sciences. The direction and magnitude of these reported differences, however, are variable and dependent on memory modality (e.g., visual, verbal), stimulus type, and research design. Previous research suggests Deaf signers may have different short-term and working memory processes compared with hearing nonsigners due to prolonged auditory deprivation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |